Need help subscribing to this blog? Simply right click on the "Subscribe to this blog's feed" link above, select "Copy shortcut," then paste the shortcut into the "Add a feed" field in your feed Reader. You need a Reader in order to subscribe.
Bookfraud is close. Webster's 11th Collegiate, which is the copyeditor's bible, says "myriad of" when used as a noun (doesn't necessarily need to follow an article), which has been acceptable usage since 1555, and "myriad" when used as an adjective.
Just going by gut instinct, myriad is an adjective, so no "of".
Posted by:Rita Williams | February 18, 2006 at 08:52 PM
No 'of' was the rule for ages, but in the last few years, someone - who? - has said it can also be a noun and 'myriad of' is acceptable now.
Posted by:Carl | February 20, 2006 at 06:45 AM
myriad: when not following an article
myriad of: when following an article
i know that i'm wrong, but it sounds right.
Posted by:bookfraud | February 20, 2006 at 04:55 PM
myriad: when not following an article
myriad of: when following an article
i know that i'm wrong, but it sounds right.
Posted by:bookfraud | February 20, 2006 at 04:56 PM
Bookfraud is close. Webster's 11th Collegiate, which is the copyeditor's bible, says "myriad of" when used as a noun (doesn't necessarily need to follow an article), which has been acceptable usage since 1555, and "myriad" when used as an adjective.
Posted by:bibliotonic | February 21, 2006 at 10:14 AM